M B A R K's Blog

ASP.NET Core: How to Implement Event-Sourcing with CQRS?

ASP.NET Core: How to Implement Event-Sourcing with CQRS?

M B A R K's photo
M B A R K
·

23 min read

Table of contents

Event-sourcing with Command Query Responsibility Segregation (CQRS) is a powerful pattern that can bring numerous benefits to your ASP.NET Core applications. By decoupling the write and read models and using event sourcing, you can achieve better scalability, maintainability, and extensibility. In this article, we will explore how to implement Event-Sourcing with CQRS using EF Core and MediatR in an ASP.NET Core application. We'll cover the fundamental concepts, provide practical examples, and use SQL Server as our database.

Prerequisites

Before we dive into the implementation, let's ensure you have the necessary tools and knowledge in place:

  • Basic understanding of ASP.NET Core and C#

  • Familiarity with Entity Framework Core (EF Core) and MediatR

  • Visual Studio 2019 or later, or any other code editor of your choice

  • SQL Server

Setting Up the Project

To get started, let's create a new ASP.NET Core Web API project. Open Visual Studio and follow these steps:

  1. Click on "Create a new project."

  2. Select "ASP.NET Core Web Application" template.

  3. Choose a name and location for your project.

  4. Select ".NET 5.0" or above as the target framework.

  5. Choose "API" as the project template.

  6. Click "Create" to generate the project structure.

Installing the Required Packages

To implement Event-Sourcing with CQRS, we need to install a few NuGet packages:

MediatR.Extensions.Microsoft.DependencyInjection
Microsoft.EntityFrameworkCore.SqlServer
Microsoft.EntityFrameworkCore.Design

These packages provide the necessary infrastructure for CQRS and EF Core integration, as well as the SQL Server provider for EF Core.

Defining the Domain Events and Commands

Before we proceed with the implementation, let's define some domain events and commands that will drive our CQRS implementation. In our example, we will build a simple e-commerce application with a product catalog. Create a new folder named "Domain" in your project and add the following classes:

Product.cs

namespace YourProject.Domain
{
    public class Product
    {
        public int Id { get; set; }
        public string Name { get; set; }
        public decimal Price { get; set; }
    }
}

ProductCreatedEvent.cs

namespace YourProject.Domain
{
    public class ProductCreatedEvent : INotification
    {
        public int ProductId { get; set; }
        public string Name { get; set; }
        public decimal Price { get; set; }
    }
}

CreateProductCommand.cs

namespace YourProject.Domain
{
    public class CreateProductCommand : IRequest<int>
    {
        public string Name { get; set; }
        public decimal Price { get; set; }
    }
}

These classes represent the product entity, the event raised when a product is created, and the command for creating a product.

Implementing the Write-Side (Command) Handler

Now, let's implement the command handler responsible for processing the CreateProductCommand. Create a new folder named "Application" in your project and add the following classes:

CreateProductCommandHandler.cs

using MediatR;
using YourProject.Domain;

namespace YourProject.Application
{
    public class CreateProductCommandHandler : IRequestHandler<CreateProductCommand, int>
    {
        private readonly YourDbContext _context;
        private readonly IMediator _mediator;

        public CreateProductCommandHandler(YourDbContext context, IMediator mediator)
        {
            _context = context;
            _mediator = mediator;
        }

        public async Task<int> Handle(CreateProductCommand command, CancellationToken cancellationToken)
        {
            var product = new Product
            {
                Name = command.Name,
                Price = command.Price
            };

            _context.Products.Add(product);
            await _context.SaveChangesAsync();

            // Reload the product to get the Id
            await _context.Entry(product).ReloadAsync(cancellationToken);

            var productCreatedEvent = new ProductCreatedEvent
            {
                ProductId = product.Id,
                Name = product.Name,
                Price = product.Price
            };

            await _mediator.Publish(productCreatedEvent);

            return product.Id;
        }
    }
}

In this class, we handle the CreateProductCommand by creating a new Product entity, saving it to the SQL Server database using EF Core, and then publishing the ProductCreatedEvent using MediatR.

Implementing the Read-Side (Event) Handler

Next, let's implement the event handler responsible for updating the read-side of our application. Create a new folder named "Infrastructure" in your project and add the following class:

ProductReadModel.cs

namespace YourProject.Infrastructure
{
    public class ProductReadModel
    {
        public int Id { get; set; }
        public string Name { get; set; }
        public decimal Price { get; set; }
    }
}

ProductCreatedEventHandler.cs

using MediatR;
using YourProject.Domain;

namespace YourProject.Infrastructure
{
    public class ProductCreatedEventHandler : INotificationHandler<ProductCreatedEvent>
    {
        private readonly YourReadDbContext _context;

        public ProductCreatedEventHandler(YourReadDbContext context)
        {
            _context = context;
        }

        public async Task Handle(ProductCreatedEvent notification, CancellationToken cancellationToken)
        {
            var product = new ProductReadModel
            {
                Id = notification.ProductId,
                Name = notification.Name,
                Price = notification.Price
            };

            _context.ProductReadModels.Add(product);
            await _context.SaveChangesAsync();
        }
    }
}

In this class, we handle the ProductCreatedEvent by creating a new ProductReadModel and saving it to the read-side database using EF Core.

Configuring MediatR and EF Core

To wire up MediatR and EF Core, we need to configure them in the ASP.NET Core dependency injection container. Open the Startup.cs file and add the following code inside the ConfigureServices method:

public void ConfigureServices(IServiceCollection services)
{
    // ...

    services.AddMediatR(typeof(Startup));

    services.AddDbContext<YourDbContext>(options =>
        options.UseSqlServer(Configuration.GetConnectionString("YourDbConnection")));

    services.AddDbContext<YourReadDbContext>(options =>
        options.UseSqlServer(Configuration.GetConnectionString("YourReadDbConnection")));

    // ...
}

Make sure to replace YourDbContext and YourReadDbContext with the actual EF Core DbContext classes in your application. Also, update the connection strings in the appsettings.json file with your SQL Server database information:

"ConnectionStrings": {
  "YourDbConnection": "Server=(localdb)\\mssqllocaldb;Database=YourDatabase;Trusted_Connection=True;",
  "YourReadDbConnection": "Server=(localdb)\\mssqllocaldb;Database=YourReadDatabase;Trusted_Connection=True;"
}

The Read-Side and Write-Side in CQRS

In Command Query Responsibility Segregation (CQRS), the architecture is divided into two distinct sides: the Read-Side and the Write-Side. Each side serves a different purpose and has separate responsibilities. Let's explore these sides in more detail.

Read-Side

The Read-Side is responsible for handling queries and retrieving data. It focuses on providing optimized read operations for fetching information to display in the user interface. The data in the Read-Side is typically denormalized and structured specifically to meet the needs of the queries.

In our example, the Read-Side is responsible for maintaining a separate database or data store optimized for reading product information. We use EF Core to interact with this database and store the read models.

Write-Side

The Write-Side is responsible for handling commands and performing write operations. It handles all the business logic and updates the state of the system. In CQRS, the Write-Side typically represents the domain model and is responsible for enforcing business rules, validating data, and persisting changes.

In our example, the Write-Side is responsible for processing the CreateProductCommand and creating a new Product entity. We use EF Core to interact with the SQL Server database and store the write models.

Separating the Read-Side and Write-Side allows us to optimize each side independently. The Write-Side can focus on consistency and ensuring the integrity of the data, while the Read-Side can focus on providing efficient and performant query operations.

By decoupling the Read-Side and Write-Side, we gain several benefits, such as:

  • Scalability: We can scale each side independently based on the workload. For example, we can scale the Read-Side horizontally to handle increased read traffic without affecting the Write-Side.

  • Performance: We can optimize the Read-Side for specific query requirements, allowing faster and more efficient data retrieval.

  • Flexibility: We can evolve the Read-Side and Write-Side independently, making it easier to introduce new features or modify existing ones without impacting the entire system.

Understanding the separation between the Read-Side and Write-Side is crucial in CQRS to design a system that can handle complex domain operations and provide efficient query capabilities.

Database Contexts

In our implementation of Event-Sourcing with CQRS using EF Core and MediatR, we utilize two different database contexts: YourDbContext and YourReadDbContext. Let's take a closer look at each of them.

YourDbContext

The YourDbContext represents the database context for the Write-Side of our application. It is responsible for interacting with the SQL Server database and managing the write models.

Here's an example of how the YourDbContext class might look:

using Microsoft.EntityFrameworkCore;
using YourProject.Domain;

namespace YourProject.Infrastructure
{
    public class YourDbContext : DbContext
    {
        public YourDbContext(DbContextOptions<YourDbContext> options) : base(options)
        {
        }

        public DbSet<Product> Products { get; set; }

        protected override void OnModelCreating(ModelBuilder modelBuilder)
        {
            // Configure entity mappings and relationships
            // ...
        }
    }
}

In this class, we inherit from the DbContext class provided by EF Core. We define a DbSet<Product> property to represent the Product entity in our database. This property allows us to query and interact with the Product table.

The YourDbContext class also includes an OnModelCreating method where you can configure entity mappings and relationships using the Fluent API. This method is useful when defining custom table names, column mappings, or complex relationships between entities.

YourReadDbContext

The YourReadDbContext represents the database context for the Read-Side of our application. It is responsible for interacting with a separate database or data store optimized for reading and managing the read models.

Here's an example of how the YourReadDbContext class might look:

using Microsoft.EntityFrameworkCore;
using YourProject.Infrastructure;

namespace YourProject.Infrastructure
{
    public class YourReadDbContext : DbContext
    {
        public YourReadDbContext(DbContextOptions<YourReadDbContext> options) : base(options)
        {
        }

        public DbSet<ProductReadModel> ProductReadModels { get; set; }

        protected override void OnModelCreating(ModelBuilder modelBuilder)
        {
            // Configure entity mappings and relationships
            // ...
        }
    }
}

Similarly to the YourDbContext, the YourReadDbContext inherits from the DbContext class and provides a DbSet<ProductReadModel> property to interact with the read model data. This property represents the read model table or data store, in this case, containing the ProductReadModel objects.

The YourReadDbContext class also includes an OnModelCreating method for configuring entity mappings and relationships specific to the read model.

Configuring Connection Strings

To connect your application to the SQL Server databases, you need to configure the connection strings. In the appsettings.json file, you can provide the connection string values as follows:

"ConnectionStrings": {
  "YourDbConnection": "Server=<your-server-name>;Database=<your-write-database-name>;Trusted_Connection=True;",
  "YourReadDbConnection": "Server=<your-server-name>;Database=<your-read-database-name>;Trusted_Connection=True;"
}

Replace <your-server-name> with the name of your SQL Server instance and <your-write-database-name> and <your-read-database-name> with the names of your write and read databases, respectively.

Example Usage in a Controller

Now that we have implemented Event-Sourcing with CQRS using EF Core and MediatR in our ASP.NET Core application, let's see an example of how we can utilize this architecture in a controller. We'll focus on the write operations, specifically creating a new product using the CreateProductCommand.

In your controller class, you can inject an instance of IMediator to handle the commands and perform the necessary operations. Here's an example:

using MediatR;
using Microsoft.AspNetCore.Mvc;
using YourProject.Domain;

namespace YourProject.Controllers
{
    [ApiController]
    [Route("api/products")]
    public class ProductController : ControllerBase
    {
        private readonly IMediator _mediator;

        public ProductController(IMediator mediator)
        {
            _mediator = mediator;
        }

        [HttpPost]
        public async Task<IActionResult> CreateProduct(CreateProductCommand command)
        {
            try
            {
                var productId = await _mediator.Send(command);
                return Ok(productId);
            }
            catch (Exception ex)
            {
                // Handle any exceptions or validation errors
                return BadRequest(ex.Message);
            }
        }
    }
}

In this example, we inject an instance of IMediator into the ProductController constructor. The IMediator interface is provided by MediatR and allows us to send commands and queries to their respective handlers.

Inside the CreateProduct action method, we receive a CreateProductCommand object as a parameter. This command contains the necessary data to create a new product.

We then use the _mediator.Send method to send the command to its corresponding command handler. The handler, in turn, processes the command, creates a new product entity, and publishes the ProductCreatedEvent.

If the command is successfully processed, we return an Ok response with the ID of the created product. If an exception occurs during command processing or validation fails, we return a BadRequest response with the corresponding error message.

Note that in a complete implementation, you would likely have additional action methods to handle read operations or other commands based on your application's requirements.

Handling "More than one DbContext was found" Error during Migrations

When working with multiple DbContext instances in your ASP.NET Core application, you may encounter the "More than one DbContext was found" error when trying to add new migrations. This error occurs because EF Core cannot determine which context to use for creating the migration since there are multiple options available. Fortunately.

Solution

One way to resolve the error is by explicitly specifying the DbContext you want to use when executing the migration command. Here's an example of how to do this using the Package Manager Console:

Add-Migration MyMigration -Context YourDbContext

Replace YourDbContext with the actual name of the context you want to use for the migration.

Other Purposes for Using Event-Sourcing

Event-Sourcing is a powerful architectural pattern that offers several benefits beyond just implementing CQRS. Let's explore some of the other purposes for using Event-Sourcing in your ASP.NET Core application:

1. Audit Log and Compliance

One of the significant advantages of Event-Sourcing is that it provides an audit log of all events that occurred within the system. Each event represents a discrete change in the application's state, making it easy to track and analyze the history of changes. This audit log can be valuable for compliance requirements, regulatory audits, or forensic analysis in case of security incidents.

By storing and replaying events, you can accurately recreate the system's state at any given point in time, making it easier to investigate issues or validate data integrity.

2. Temporal Queries and Analytics

Event-Sourcing also enables temporal queries, allowing you to answer questions about the past state of your application. By replaying events and reconstructing the state of your entities, you can perform analytics and gain insights into trends, patterns, and historical data.

Temporal queries can be useful for generating reports, visualizations, or performing retrospective analysis to identify areas for improvement or make data-driven decisions.

3. Resilience and Disaster Recovery

Since Event-Sourcing captures every state change as an event, it provides a natural mechanism for resilience and disaster recovery. By replaying events, you can rebuild the system's state in case of failures, errors, or data corruption.

In the event of a catastrophic failure, such as a database failure or complete system outage, Event-Sourcing allows you to restore the system by replaying the stored events and rebuilding the entity state. This ensures that your application can recover from unexpected issues and continue functioning with minimal downtime.

4. Versioning and Evolution of Business Logic

Event-Sourcing promotes decoupling between the events and the business logic that processes them. This decoupling allows for greater flexibility in evolving the application over time.

As you introduce new features or modify existing ones, you can handle different versions of events and update the event handlers accordingly. This allows for backward compatibility, as old events can still be processed while new events follow updated business logic.

Example Audit Log for Product: ProductCreated Event

To demonstrate an example of an audit log for the ProductCreated event in our Event-Sourcing implementation, we'll store the events in a separate database. We'll define the necessary classes and structures to support this functionality. Let's dive into the details.

1. AuditLogEvent Entity

We'll start by creating an AuditLogEvent entity that represents an individual event in the audit log. This entity will store information about the event, such as the event type, timestamp, user, and any additional data associated with the event.

using System;

namespace YourProject.AuditLog
{
    public class AuditLogEvent
    {
        public int Id { get; set; }
        public string EventType { get; set; }
        public DateTime Timestamp { get; set; }
        public string User { get; set; }
        public string EventData { get; set; }
    }
}

In this example, the AuditLogEvent class contains properties like Id (unique identifier for the event), EventType (describes the type of the event, e.g., "ProductCreated"), Timestamp (when the event occurred), User (the user who initiated the event), and EventData (additional data related to the event).

2. AuditLogDbContext

Next, we'll define a dedicated AuditLogDbContext that will handle the storage of audit log events in a separate database.

using Microsoft.EntityFrameworkCore;

namespace YourProject.AuditLog
{
    public class AuditLogDbContext : DbContext
    {
        public DbSet<AuditLogEvent> AuditLogEvents { get; set; }

        public AuditLogDbContext(DbContextOptions<AuditLogDbContext> options) : base(options)
        {
        }

        protected override void OnModelCreating(ModelBuilder modelBuilder)
        {
            // Configure entity mappings, constraints, etc.
        }
    }
}

In this class, we define a DbSet<AuditLogEvent> property called AuditLogEvents to represent the table/collection for storing the audit log events.

3. Storing ProductCreated Events

When handling the ProductCreated event in the domain logic, we'll also publish the event to the audit log by storing it in the separate AuditLogDbContext.

using MediatR;
using YourProject.AuditLog;
using YourProject.Domain.Events;
using System.Text.Json;

namespace YourProject.Domain.EventHandlers
{
    public class ProductCreatedEventHandler : INotificationHandler<ProductCreatedEvent>
    {
        private readonly AuditLogDbContext _auditLogDbContext;

        public ProductCreatedEventHandler(AuditLogDbContext auditLogDbContext)
        {
            _auditLogDbContext = auditLogDbContext;
        }

        public async Task Handle(ProductCreatedEvent notification, CancellationToken cancellationToken)
        {
            // Process the event logic
            // ...

            // Store the event in the audit log
            var auditLogEvent = new AuditLogEvent
            {
                EventType = "ProductCreated",
                Timestamp = DateTime.UtcNow,
                User = "MBARK",
                EventData = JsonSerializer.Serialize(notification)
            };

            _auditLogDbContext.AuditLogEvents.Add(auditLogEvent);
            await _auditLogDbContext.SaveChangesAsync();
        }
    }
}

In this example, we inject the AuditLogDbContext into the ProductCreatedEventHandler. Inside the Handle method, we perform the event-specific logic and create an AuditLogEvent object with the relevant information. We then add this event to the AuditLogEvents DbSet and save the changes to persist it in the audit log database.

4. Configuring the AuditLogDbContext

To ensure the AuditLogDbContext is configured correctly, we need to register it in the application's startup code.

public void ConfigureServices(IServiceCollection services)
{
    // ...

    services.AddDbContext<AuditLogDbContext>(options =>
        options.UseSqlServer(Configuration.GetConnectionString("AuditLogDbConnection")));

    // ...
}

Here, we register the AuditLogDbContext using the appropriate database provider and connection string. Make sure to update the connection string ("AuditLogDbConnection") to point to the desired database where the audit log events will be stored.

Replaying Events from the Audit Log

After storing events in the audit log, one of the significant benefits of Event-Sourcing is the ability to replay those events to rebuild the state of the system at any given point in time. In our ASP.NET Core application, we can implement event replay functionality to achieve this. Let's explore how to replay events from the audit log.

1. Retrieving Events from the Audit Log

To replay events, we need to retrieve them from the audit log database. We can create a dedicated service or class that encapsulates the logic for retrieving events.

using System.Collections.Generic;
using YourProject.AuditLog;

namespace YourProject.EventReplay
{
    public class EventReplayService
    {
        private readonly AuditLogDbContext _auditLogDbContext;

        public EventReplayService(AuditLogDbContext auditLogDbContext)
        {
            _auditLogDbContext = auditLogDbContext;
        }

        public IEnumerable<AuditLogEvent> GetEvents()
        {
            return _auditLogDbContext.AuditLogEvents.ToList();
        }
    }
}

In this example, we create an EventReplayService that depends on the AuditLogDbContext. The GetEvents method retrieves all the events from the AuditLogEvents DbSet and returns them as an enumerable collection.

2. Replaying Events

Once we have retrieved the events, we can replay them to rebuild the state of the system. Typically, this involves executing the necessary event handlers or processors that update the system's state based on the events.

using MediatR;
using YourProject.Domain.EventHandlers;
using YourProject.Domain.Events;

namespace YourProject.EventReplay
{
    public class EventReplayService
    {
        private readonly AuditLogDbContext _auditLogDbContext;
        private readonly IMediator _mediator;

        public EventReplayService(AuditLogDbContext auditLogDbContext, IMediator mediator)
        {
            _auditLogDbContext = auditLogDbContext;
            _mediator = mediator;
        }

        public async Task ReplayEvents()
        {
            var events = await _auditLogDbContext.AuditLogEvents.ToListAsync();

            foreach (var auditLogEvent in events)
            {
                // Determine the event type and execute the corresponding event handler
                switch (auditLogEvent.EventType)
                {
                    case "ProductCreated":
                        var productCreatedEvent = new ProductCreatedEvent
                        {
                            // Populate the event properties based on the event data
                            // ...
                        };
                        await _mediator.Publish(productCreatedEvent);
                        break;

                    // Handle other event types...

                    default:
                        // Unknown event type
                        break;
                }
            }
        }
    }
}

In this example, we modify the EventReplayService to use the IMediator interface from MediatR. Inside the ReplayEvents method, we iterate over the events retrieved from the audit log and determine the event type. Based on the event type, we create an instance of the corresponding event class (e.g., ProductCreatedEvent) and populate its properties with the relevant data from the audit log event. We then publish the event using the MediatR's Publish method, allowing the event handlers to process the event and update the system's state accordingly.

3. Registering the EventReplayService

To register the EventReplayService as a service in your ASP.NET Core application, you need to add it to the dependency injection container. Here's an example of how you can register the EventReplayService in your startup class:

using YourProject.EventReplay;

public class Startup
{
    // Other configuration code...

    public void ConfigureServices(IServiceCollection services)
    {
        // Register the EventReplayService
        services.AddScoped<EventReplayService>();

        // Other service registrations...
        // Other configurations...
    }

    // Other methods...
}

In this example, the EventReplayService is registered using the AddScoped method, which creates a new instance of the service per scope. Adjust the lifetime of the service (AddScoped, AddSingleton, or AddTransient) based on your application's requirements.

4. Triggering Event Replay

To trigger the event replay process, you can create an endpoint or a background task that calls the ReplayEvents method.

using Microsoft.AspNetCore.Mvc;
using YourProject.EventReplay;

namespace YourProject.Controllers
{
    [ApiController]
    [Route("api/eventreplay")]
    public class EventReplayController : ControllerBase
    {
        private readonly EventReplayService _eventReplayService;

        public EventReplayController(EventReplayService eventReplayService)
        {
            _eventReplayService = eventReplayService;
        }

        [HttpPost]
        public IActionResult ReplayEvents()
        {
            _eventReplayService.ReplayEvents();

            return Ok("Event replay initiated");
        }
    }
}

In this example, we create an EventReplayController with a single endpoint that triggers the event replay process by calling the ReplayEvents method of the EventReplayService. You can customize the endpoint route and authentication/authorization requirements as per your application's needs.

Wait, wait, What the Difference Between Publishing Events from Commands and from the ReplayEvents Method?

In an Event-Sourcing system, events are typically published as a result of executing commands or handling domain-specific actions. However, there is a difference in the context and purpose of publishing events from commands and from the ReplayEvents method. Let's explore these differences.

Publishing Events from Commands

When events are published from commands, it usually occurs during the normal flow of the application when a user or an external system triggers a command. Commands represent actions or intentions that drive the behavior of the system. When a command is executed, it may result in changes to the system's state, and events are published to capture those changes.

The process of publishing events from commands involves the following steps:

  1. Command Execution: The command is executed, typically within a command handler, which performs the necessary business logic and updates the state of the system.

  2. Event Generation: As part of the command handling process, one or more events are generated to represent the changes that occurred as a result of executing the command.

  3. Event Publishing: The generated events are published using a suitable mechanism, such as an event bus or a mediator, to notify interested components within the system. This allows event handlers to react and update their own state or trigger further actions.

Publishing events from commands serves as a means of communicating the state changes and propagating them throughout the system, ensuring that other components are aware of and can respond to those changes.

Publishing Events from the ReplayEvents Method

On the other hand, publishing events from the ReplayEvents method is part of the event replay process, which is distinct from the normal flow of the application. Event replay involves reconstructing the state of the system by processing previously stored events. It allows us to rebuild the state of the system at a specific point in time by replaying the events in the order they occurred.

The process of publishing events from the ReplayEvents method involves the following steps:

  1. Retrieving Events: The events are retrieved from the audit log or event store, typically through a dedicated service or component responsible for handling event replay.

  2. Event Replay: Each event is processed, often by executing the corresponding event handler(s) to update the system's state based on the event's data. This may involve executing domain-specific logic or updating aggregates/entities.

  3. Event Publishing: As events are replayed, they are published using the same event publishing mechanism as in the command flow. The published events can trigger additional event handlers, which may update their own state or perform any necessary actions.

The purpose of publishing events from the ReplayEvents method is to replicate the past state changes and update the system's state accordingly. It allows us to rebuild the state of the system as if the events were happening in real-time.

Avoiding Duplicate Event Storage during Replay

To avoid storing events again in the database during event replay, you can introduce an IsReplay property in your events. This property indicates whether the event is being replayed or not. By checking the value of this property in your event handlers, you can determine whether to store the event in the database or not. Let's modify the code for the ProductCreatedEventHandler to include the IsReplay property.

using MediatR;
using YourProject.AuditLog;
using YourProject.Domain.Events;
using System.Text.Json;

namespace YourProject.Domain.EventHandlers
{
    public class ProductCreatedEventHandler : INotificationHandler<ProductCreatedEvent>
    {
        // The rest of code stay the same

        public async Task Handle(ProductCreatedEvent notification, CancellationToken cancellationToken)
        {
            // Process the event logic
            // ...

            if (!notification.IsReplay)
            {
                // Store the event in the audit log
                var auditLogEvent = new AuditLogEvent
                {
                    EventType = "ProductCreated",
                    Timestamp = DateTime.UtcNow,
                    User = "MBARK",
                    EventData = JsonSerializer.Serialize(notification)
                };

                _auditLogDbContext.AuditLogEvents.Add(auditLogEvent);
                await _auditLogDbContext.SaveChangesAsync();
            }
        }
    }
}

In this modified code, we introduce an IsReplay property in the ProductCreatedEvent class (assuming it inherits from a base event class):

public class ProductCreatedEvent : INotification
{
    // Other event properties...

    public bool IsReplay { get; set; }
}

When replaying events, ensure that the IsReplay property is set to true before publishing the events. This way, when the event handlers process the events during replay, they will skip the database storage logic based on the value of IsReplay.

By introducing the IsReplay property and checking its value in the event handlers, you can control whether to store the event in the database or perform any other actions specific to replay scenarios. This allows you to differentiate between events published during the normal flow of the application and events being replayed to rebuild the system's state.

Remember to set the IsReplay property accordingly when publishing events during replay to ensure that the event handlers can identify and handle them correctly.

What about ReplayEvents method?

When implementing the ReplayEvents method in the service, you can pass the IsReplay property to the events being replayed to indicate that they are part of the replay process. Here's an updated version of the ReplayEvents method that includes the IsReplay property:

using MediatR;
using YourProject.Domain.Events;

namespace YourProject.EventReplay
{
    public class EventReplayService
    {
        private readonly AuditLogDbContext _auditLogDbContext;
        private readonly IMediator _mediator;

        public EventReplayService(AuditLogDbContext auditLogDbContext, IMediator mediator)
        {
            _auditLogDbContext = auditLogDbContext;
            _mediator = mediator;
        }

        public async Task ReplayEvents()
        {
            var events = await _auditLogDbContext.AuditLogEvents.ToListAsync();

            foreach (var auditLogEvent in events)
            {
                // Determine the event type and execute the corresponding event handler
                switch (auditLogEvent.EventType)
                {
                    case "ProductCreated":
                        var productCreatedEvent = new ProductCreatedEvent
                        {
                            // Populate the event properties based on the event data
                            // ...
                            IsReplay = true // Set IsReplay property to true during replay
                        };
                        await _mediator.Publish(productCreatedEvent);
                        break;

                    // Handle other event types...

                    default:
                        // Unknown event type
                        break;
                }
            }
        }
    }
}

In this updated code, when creating an instance of each event during the replay process, you set the IsReplay property to true. This indicates that the event is being replayed and should be processed differently in the event handlers, as we saw earlier in the ProductCreatedEventHandler.

By including the IsReplay property in the events and setting it to true during replay, you can handle them appropriately in the event handlers. This allows you to differentiate between events triggered during the normal application flow and events replayed for rebuilding the system's state.

Other Concepts

In addition to implementing event sourcing with CQRS using EF Core and MediatR, there are several other important concepts and considerations that can enhance your event-driven architecture. Let's explore some of them briefly:

1. Event Versioning and Compatibility

As your application evolves, event schemas may change. It's crucial to handle event versioning and ensure backward compatibility. Consider techniques such as event versioning, event migration, or supporting multiple event versions to handle changes in event structures.

2. Eventual Consistency

Event sourcing typically relies on eventual consistency, where changes propagated through events may not be immediately reflected across all components. Understand the implications of eventual consistency and design your system accordingly. Consider techniques like sagas or compensating actions to maintain data integrity.

3. Event Serialization and Messaging

When events are published and consumed by different services, serialization and messaging protocols play a vital role. Choose appropriate serialization formats (e.g., JSON, Protobuf) and messaging frameworks (e.g., RabbitMQ, Apache Kafka) that align with your application's requirements in terms of performance, reliability, and scalability.

4. Error Handling and Resilience

Implement robust error handling mechanisms to handle failures during event processing. Consider techniques such as retry policies, dead-letter queues, or circuit breakers to ensure the system's resilience and fault tolerance.

5. Snapshotting

Snapshotting allows you to optimize the event replay process by storing periodic snapshots of aggregate/entity states. Instead of replaying all events from the beginning, you can restore the state from the nearest snapshot and replay only the subsequent events. This can significantly improve performance for systems with a large event history.

6. Eventual Eventual Consistency

In some scenarios, you may need to ensure eventual consistency not only within a single service but also across multiple services in a distributed system. Techniques like distributed transactions, message brokers, or event-driven data synchronization can be used to achieve eventual eventual consistency.

7. Event-driven Integration with External Systems

Event-driven architectures can be extended to integrate with external systems through event-driven integration patterns. Consider using concepts like event adapters, event-driven APIs, or event-driven data replication to connect and synchronize data with external systems.

Demo Project

If you're eager to see a practical implementation of event-sourcing with CQRS using EF Core and MediatR, you're in luck! I have provided a demo project on GitHub that showcases the concepts discussed in this article. You can find the demo project at GitHub - EventSourcingDemo. Feel free to explore the code, experiment with it, and gain hands-on experience with event-driven architectures.

Conclusion

In this article, we explored ASP.NET Core, event-sourcing, CQRS, EF Core, and MediatR to build event-driven architectures. We learned how to implement event-sourcing with CQRS using these technologies and discussed concepts like event replay, versioning, serialization, messaging, resilience, and integration. By embracing event-driven architecture, we can create scalable, flexible, and maintainable systems that adapt to evolving business needs.

asp.net core.NETevent-driven-architecturesoftware architecturesoftware development